Die tatsächliche Quelle des Photos scheint sich vielmehr hier zu befinden:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/doublevelvet/117156289/in/pool-fakevertising/ Und der Autor denkt sich durchaus etwas dabei:
"
As a believer in freedom of expression any satire is allowed...hence my use of Swift's idea to eat children to solve the food shortage problem...certainly satirising modes of dress and making fun of their priests are within the boundries of 'good taste' (even Jesus gave the samaritans a run for their money) I have similarly made 'fun' of JP the second (and popes generally) in the pope funeral piece...all this is commonly refered to as satire and is a very important part of the free speech arsenal. I choose not to represent the prophet or to desecrate the cruxifix out of common courtesy,these are the 'easiest' targets, that is all. Madonna's use of the cruxifix in the early part of her career was both cheap and 'young'. People should be allowed to believe in god if they choose...people should also be allowed not to believe. Religious fascism or secular fascism are equally offensive. I would still appreciate seeing your face Krishna, as calling people to arms anonymously is usually called baiting. Part of the problem with this woman for me is precisely that I cannot see her face and she believes (it is entombed in her religion) that I should be put up against a wall and have it bulldozered on top of me or should be hanged. This situation needs to be addressed and satire is how I choose to do that. I would hope to achieve being 'universally offensive' in a humourous way whilst still allowing for the fact that some people still need to believe and some don't. I also try to make fun (again using satire) of Gays and the art establishment without having to face my life being threatened. Your faceless presence on the internet is no different from wearing a burqa, it is easy to throw stones whilst your identity is hidden.
"
und
"
I know the arguments. I haven't been sitting on my hands since I received the sheep's head delivered to my door by Islamic fundamentalists.
Thankfully there are other things happening in the world other than the schism between Islam and the West...for example weather change, the economic growth of China, Global warming, Sweden's decision to be free of dependance on fossil fuels by 2015 (very smart)...Although I recognise the schism as being important, there is a bigger picture too...When I say I would not represent 'the prophet', I also mean I wouldn't defile the cruxifix or stick the buddha where the sun don't shine, it is just an act of common courtesy...that does not mean that I would not resist intolerance (and call it that) where I see it. Muslims think I should be killed and all women should be covered, I disagree, so I challenge that. Otherwise I will not represent something they hold absoloutely sacred to express my anger. This does not in anyway prohibit me from representing Sistani, and El Sadr, Bush, Benedict/John Paul and the like. I think you will have noticed from my photostream that I am struggling to avoid polarisation as we are all being pushed in that direction by either and both factions (Fundamentalist of Christian or Muslim varieties). I will, of course read the articles proffered and will take my own investigations further.
"
